By: Anand Krishna
Not too long ago, I faced a situation, when for the first
time I realized that to some people love and loins are inseparable. To them,
love making is the only possible expression of love. They cannot think of love
as anything else other than the meeting of human genitals.
I have this habit of signing my books “with love” –
always. Having done that for more than a
decade, I faced a situation when even that line was being questioned. Thus, I
was being projected as the perfect blend of Caligula and Casanova.
Why do I sign my books “with love”?
Or why do I close my letters, my emails, with love? Or why
do I say, “I love you” to an elderly person, to a kid, a teenage, or anyone? It
may be inconceivable to you that a sane mind can ever ask such questions. You
may find it difficult to believe that such thing can happen. I did find it
difficult too, until I began to realise, very slowly and rather painfully, that
though geographically we inhibit the same planet Earth, we are actually living
in different worlds, where a same word can mean differently to different
peoples.
It took me some time to realize that those who were
questioning me had no “love” in their vocabulary. Yes, the word “love” was
missing in their dictionary. You may find it amusing; well, it is not. It is a
hard fact.
The Javanese word for “love” is “trisna.” Later the Balinese
adopted the same word, too. Now “trisna” is derived from the Sanskrit
“trishna,” which has the meaning of
“craving” – desiring, wanting. It can have any meaning but love. Trishna is not
love. It is more of passion than love.
Trishna is an outburst of emotion. It is not love.
Our emotions is centred in our brain. A minor dysfunction of
the brain can affect our emotions. We cannot express our emotions without using
the brain-tool.
Love is something beyond brain and its functions. Love
arises from our innermost being, the so-called antah-karana in the language of
ancients – our inner causal body.
It took me some time to realize that those who misunderstood
love were actually missing the very word
of their mother tongue.
Yes, love is missing in the Javanese lexicons. The Balinese,
later adopted the word “asih” from the Malay “kasih” to describe a higher form
of love, above the sensual “craving” type trisna. Not bad. However, generally
speaking, both the Javanese and the Balinese lovers still use the word “trisna”
to express their love for each other.
Understanding misunderstanding
I began to sympathize with them. Poor souls – they did not
understand what love was, what love meant. A husband clings to his wife, and
would do anything for her, just because she was good in bed – love. Love?
A wife accepts her notorious and rather neurotic husband,
because, “in our society, a divorcee has no status.” Love. Love?
Budding youngsters with no career, no job, get married
because “it is safer to have sex at home with your partner.” Love. Love?
I sympathize with them, but it does not mean I should accept
them. It does not mean that I should accept their understanding of love. Given
that they have no adequate word for love, but all inadequacies can be turned
into adequacies.
It is wrong to glorify our inadequacy, and justify all our
actions, or rather misbehaviours resulting from such.
Ancient Greek’s Ways
Agape refers to a pure, or the ideal, type of love that
differs from Eros, the passionate love, the sensual type.
And then, there is Philia, the virtuous kind that expresses
itself through the acts of loyalty, equality, and etcetera. Storge, or the
natural affection felt by parents for their offspring. Lastly, Xenia that
expresses itself as hospitality toward guests, care for strangers, and the
like.
Each of these has an equivalent in Sanskrit.
Prema (Agape), Kama ( Eros ), Karuna (Philia), Mamta
(Storge), Karuna (Xenia), indeed, there are many more words for love in
Sanskrit than any other language, ancient or modern. Rati, Asakti , Moha –
these are the attachment – based love.
But, above all is: Bhakti – love turned into devotion.
It is here that love is 100 percent free of all
expectations. It is the unconditional and infinite love, pure compassion.
Siddhartha Gautama, the Buddha, the Awakened One, called it Metta, or Maitri –
love that befriends all, love that cares for all, love that is ever ready to
share all that is has with all.
Now, those who define love as Trishna, which is related to
Eros or Kama, can never ever comprehend Bhakti. It is beyond their
understanding. Therefore, it should not surprise us if these very people would
conspire to crucify a Jesus, poison a Siddharta or force a Muhammad into exile.
Pity.
I sympathize with them. But I must once again repeat; I
neither appreciate nor accept their adequacy. Coin a word, use Kasih, Prema,
Agape, whatever, but rise above your loins. Enjoy Eros, but know that is not
the only definition of love. Love has many shades, many colours, and each
shade, each colour, adds to its lustre, its glory and its beauty. Embrace Love
in its totality, in its entirety. That is for now.
Anand Krishna is a spiritual activist and author with
healing centres in Jakarta and Bali, including a new live - in Ashram in Ubud (www.ubud.anandashram.asia)
No comments:
Post a Comment